Gentoo Archives: gentoo-security

From: Grant Goodyear <g2boojum@g.o>
To:
Cc: gentoo-security@l.g.o
Subject: Re: [gentoo-security] ewarn/einfo behavior (was Samba Testing Help)
Date: Wed, 14 Apr 2004 12:36:14
Message-Id: 407D3015.9020006@gentoo.org
In Reply to: Re: [gentoo-security] ewarn/einfo behavior (was Samba Testing Help) by Mark Guertin
1 Mark Guertin wrote:
2 > I personally don't have the time to chase this down and spec it out, but
3 > hopefully someone else on the list would pick up the ball and take it!
4
5 Of course, that statement is precisely why the ewarn/einfo behavior has
6 been broken for two years now. Please note that I am not criticising
7 Mr. Guertin in any way. I simply wish to point out that it is not at
8 all uncommon for people to post messages saying that "foo" is important
9 and should really be added (or fixed), but due to a lack of manpower the
10 problem lingers.
11
12 -g2boojum-

Attachments

File name MIME type
signature.asc application/pgp-signature

Replies

Subject Author
Re: [gentoo-security] ewarn/einfo behavior (was Samba Testing Help) Anthony Metcalf <anthony.metcalf@×××××××××××.cx>