1 |
Mark Guertin wrote: |
2 |
> I personally don't have the time to chase this down and spec it out, but |
3 |
> hopefully someone else on the list would pick up the ball and take it! |
4 |
|
5 |
Of course, that statement is precisely why the ewarn/einfo behavior has |
6 |
been broken for two years now. Please note that I am not criticising |
7 |
Mr. Guertin in any way. I simply wish to point out that it is not at |
8 |
all uncommon for people to post messages saying that "foo" is important |
9 |
and should really be added (or fixed), but due to a lack of manpower the |
10 |
problem lingers. |
11 |
|
12 |
-g2boojum- |