Gentoo Archives: gentoo-security

From: Kurt Lieber <klieber@g.o>
To: Koon <koon@××××××.net>
Cc: gentoo-security@l.g.o
Subject: Re: [gentoo-security] Gentoo security policy
Date: Thu, 18 Mar 2004 14:03:57
Message-Id: 20040318140359.GW26101@mail.lieber.org
In Reply to: Re: [gentoo-security] Gentoo security policy by Koon
1 On Thu, Mar 18, 2004 at 02:57:14PM +0100 or thereabouts, Koon wrote:
2 > Could you detail in what areas help is needed, so that we can evaluate
3 > if our profiles (free time and knowledge) can fit in ?
4
5 We need folks to monitor bugzilla for security-related postings and then
6 push valid postings through the GLSA process.
7
8 > However I had concern recently with the latest kernel GLSA which has
9 > been over-delayed in my opinion. I've posted about this in this
10 > mailing-list so that we can discuss steps to avoid such delays in the
11 > future, but with no answer from the official people in charge.
12
13 Kernel GLSAs are difficult because we can't release the GLSA until all our
14 kernels have been patched. Our kernel team is also short-staffed, so that
15 takes time. Know any good kernel hackers that want to help out? Send them
16 my way and I'll make sure they get put in touch with the right person.
17
18 > There is one point where I agree with Tobias : too many GLSA diffusion
19 > channels might increase the potential sync problems. gentoo main page,
20 > forums, mailing-list(s), GLSA-test hub... I think we have to be careful
21 > about that.
22
23 gentoo-announce is *the* official means of distributing GLSAs. If you want
24 to make sure you receive all GLSAs, sign up for that. We also publish to
25 external lists as a "best practice" and a way to reach out to the larger
26 Linux community to ensure they're aware of vulnerabilities as well.
27
28 --kurt

Replies

Subject Author
Re: [gentoo-security] Gentoo security policy "Matthias F. Brandstetter" <haimat@××××.at>
Re: [gentoo-security] Gentoo security policy Koon <koon@××××××.net>