Gentoo Archives: gentoo-security

From: Helder Miguel Gaspar Rodrigues <crash@××××.org>
To: gentoo-security@l.g.o
Subject: Re: [gentoo-security] /proc vulnerability?
Date: Wed, 04 Aug 2004 21:44:30
Message-Id: 41115894.1040603@frew.org
In Reply to: Re: [gentoo-security] /proc vulnerability? by Dan Margolis
1 -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
2 Hash: SHA1
3
4 I have gentoo-sources, how can i test if my kernel is vulnurable?
5 I have already compiled the proof-of-concept code.
6
7 Thanks in advance
8
9 Dan Margolis wrote:
10
11 | Joey McCoy wrote:
12 | | Please forgive me if this has already been in a GLSA, but a buddy of
13 mine
14 | | forwarded it to me, and I didn't know if it might benefit everyone by me
15 | | passing along the info.
16 | |
17 | |
18 | | http://isec.pl/vulnerabilities/isec-0016-procleaks.txt
19 |
20 | Thanks for the heads-up. We actually already have a bug filed for this,
21 | however, at bugs.gentoo.org.
22 |
23 | For future reference, our policy
24 | (http://www.gentoo.org/security/en/#doc_chap4) for bug submission,
25 | including security bugs, is for them to be submitted via our bugzilla at
26 | http://bugs.gentoo.org/. This also allows you to see if a bug has
27 | already been sumbitted, to avoid duplicates.
28 |
29 | Thanks!
30
31 - --
32 gentoo-security@g.o mailing list
33
34
35 -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
36 Version: GnuPG v1.2.3-nr1 (Windows XP)
37 Comment: Using GnuPG with Thunderbird - http://enigmail.mozdev.org
38
39 iD8DBQFBEViTXuDuuXe+pHkRAk5DAKCo5/+TbwBRKxjQdE8n2pghJJFn8ACeMYfj
40 Pgx77i2dyzQI9d6cY2DESpo=
41 =+pQA
42 -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
43
44
45 --
46 gentoo-security@g.o mailing list

Replies

Subject Author
Re: [gentoo-security] /proc vulnerability? Henno Schooljan <gentoo@×××××××××.nl>
Re: [gentoo-security] /proc vulnerability? Thierry Carrez <koon@g.o>