1 |
Hi, |
2 |
|
3 |
> Hmm, giving it a quick shot in Mozilla, it doesn't appear to... but I |
4 |
> might be doing something wrong. I never really think about using |
5 |
> browsers to access ftp. I just use the command line or an app like |
6 |
> filezilla. However, I haven't had need of an ftp server that provides |
7 |
> anonymous web-based access (like for code downloads)... something which |
8 |
> may change soon enough... so, I'll be remembering pureftp and proftp... |
9 |
> Is one easier to setup and maintain than the other? |
10 |
|
11 |
I don't think that sftp could allow access via a web browser and I |
12 |
think that a web browser can access also non anonymously to an |
13 |
ftp site managed by proftpd or pure-ftpd and also by ssl. I'm not |
14 |
100% sure, because I don't have direct and recent experience about |
15 |
that, but I think that could be like that. |
16 |
|
17 |
I don't know if one is easier to setup and maintain than the other, |
18 |
but maybe, if I don't remember bad, there was a webmin module |
19 |
for proftpd (you could verify on the webmin site). I don't know if |
20 |
there are a similar module for pure-ftp, but I saw that at the home |
21 |
page of pure-ftp there are a program to manage the software. |
22 |
If you don't receive more and more convincing replies, I advice |
23 |
you to go to the sites of the two software to see how is the |
24 |
documentation and if there are some software to setup and maintain |
25 |
the two ones. |
26 |
|
27 |
For sure a program that you can use to manage both, is vi ;-) |
28 |
|
29 |
Andrea |