| 1 |
Miroslav Šulc <fordfrog@g.o> 于2020年7月12日周日 下午11:59写道： |
| 2 |
> |
| 3 |
> hi Zhongyu, |
| 4 |
> |
| 5 |
> thank you for the report! looks like a nice progress to me :-) is there |
| 6 |
> anything i could help you with? |
| 7 |
|
| 8 |
I think we may discuss about how to compare locally compiles jars and |
| 9 |
binjars, and how to emerge kotlin, scala and lombok source files. |
| 10 |
|
| 11 |
> wrt java-virtuals/*, there was a request (from mgorny iirc) to get rid |
| 12 |
> of java-virtuals/*. imo the logic of java-virtuals should be preserved, |
| 13 |
> but the virtuals should be placed under dev-java/ and use a naming |
| 14 |
> template like this: |
| 15 |
> |
| 16 |
> virtual = dev-java/servlet-api |
| 17 |
> implementations = dev-java/tomcat-servlet-api, |
| 18 |
> dev-java/glassfish-servlet-api etc. |
| 19 |
> |
| 20 |
> also, is java-pkg-simple.eclass ready for the main tree? and if so, did |
| 21 |
> you consider to go through the review process of the eclass? it might |
| 22 |
> take some time to get through the process so it might be good to start |
| 23 |
> the process soon to not be blocked by the process later. |
| 24 |
|
| 25 |
Currently, there are few differences between the main tree version and |
| 26 |
the one in my overlay. |
| 27 |
Functions to deal with JAVA_RESOURCES and JAVA_TEST_SRC_DIR do not |
| 28 |
appear in java-pkg-simple now. |
| 29 |
I am not sure whether I should go through the review now, because |
| 30 |
there isn't so much progress for java-pkg-simple. |
| 31 |
So maybe I will not go through the review this week. |
| 32 |
|
| 33 |
> i also just pushed your commits to the main java-ebuilder repo. |
| 34 |
> |
| 35 |
> thank you for your work and best regards! |
| 36 |
> |
| 37 |
> miroslav |
| 38 |
> |
| 39 |
> |
| 40 |
|
| 41 |
Regards, |
| 42 |
Zhang Zongyu |
Archives