| 1 |
Hi, Alan. |
| 2 |
|
| 3 |
On Wed, May 18, 2011 at 09:03:47PM +0200, Alan McKinnon wrote: |
| 4 |
> Apparently, though unproven, at 12:17 on Wednesday 18 May 2011, Neil Bothwick |
| 5 |
> did opine thusly: |
| 6 |
|
| 7 |
> > On Tue, 17 May 2011 18:38:33 +0100, Stroller wrote: |
| 8 |
> > > Not addressed at you, specifically, but it rather seems like sed & |
| 9 |
> > > awk are much under-appreciated these days. I'd guess that this may |
| 10 |
> > > be due to the changing nature of *nix users, but they seem to have |
| 11 |
> > > "gone out of fashion". Aside from sed's simple replace, I have |
| 12 |
> > > certainly never learned to do anything useful with them. |
| 13 |
|
| 14 |
> > They both have a steep initial learning curve, which leads to their |
| 15 |
> > adoption being put off. I put awk in the same category as screen, one |
| 16 |
> > of those programs that you hear people going on about for years, but |
| 17 |
> > always manage to put off trying them. Once you do try them, you use |
| 18 |
> > them for everything but slicing bread. |
| 19 |
|
| 20 |
|
| 21 |
> Add bash to that list. |
| 22 |
|
| 23 |
> Have you read the full man page for the bloody thing? |
| 24 |
|
| 25 |
You're not meant to read that man page through from beginning to end. |
| 26 |
Anybody who could learn bash that way would be superhuman. |
| 27 |
Unfortunately, the info pages for bash are not well organised. So |
| 28 |
beginners have to learn from books, many of which are not good. |
| 29 |
|
| 30 |
And bash is about the most disorganised, arbitrary language around, full |
| 31 |
of crazy little quirks and odd sytaxes. And I love it. ;-) |
| 32 |
|
| 33 |
> No wonder most folk stop at launching it after login |
| 34 |
|
| 35 |
> -- |
| 36 |
> alan dot mckinnon at gmail dot com |
| 37 |
|
| 38 |
-- |
| 39 |
Alan Mackenzie (Nuremberg, Germany). |
Archives