Gentoo Archives: gentoo-user

From: "»Q«" <boxcars@×××.net>
To: gentoo-user@l.g.o
Subject: [gentoo-user] Re: 2 to 3??
Date: Tue, 17 Jul 2007 22:18:00
Message-Id: l2rvm4-fau.ln1@goldry.remarqs.net
In Reply to: Re: [gentoo-user] 2 to 3?? by Mike Edenfield
1 In <news:469D18A7.9090001@××××××.org>,
2 Mike Edenfield <kutulu@××××××.org> wrote:
3
4 >Boyd Stephen Smith Jr. wrote:
5 >
6 >> Remember that the GPL has always been about all the users NOT just
7 >> the developers/distributors -- "adapt it to your needs" is not
8 >> allowed when it restricts other users' freedoms.
9 >
10 >Very few GPL proponents are willing to make this (rather obviously
11 >true) statement; I'm glad some are. But to be more accurate, one
12 >should say that the GPL has always been about guaranteeing users
13 >freedoms *at the expense of* the developer's freedoms.
14
15 Perhaps you mean downstream developers who accept the GPL granted by
16 upstream? The original developers can do whatever they like with their
17 code, since they don't need to license it from anyone.
18
19 --
20 »Q«
21
22 --
23 gentoo-user@g.o mailing list

Replies

Subject Author
Re: [gentoo-user] Re: 2 to 3?? Mike Edenfield <kutulu@××××××.org>