| 1 |
On Tue, November 22, 2011 11:47 pm, William Kenworthy wrote: |
| 2 |
|
| 3 |
<snipped> |
| 4 |
|
| 5 |
> YMMV ... VB is stable and rarely if ever breaks, app and modules "just |
| 6 |
> work" - performance is as good as vmware |
| 7 |
|
| 8 |
I actually found VB to have better performance. |
| 9 |
|
| 10 |
When using virtual machines, I tend to run multiple simultaneously. |
| 11 |
VirtualBox can handle more on similar hardware the VMWare. |
| 12 |
The settings for the VMs (harddisk size, memory size) are identical. |
| 13 |
For video-settings, as they generally tend to run server applications, I |
| 14 |
really don't care for those and the basic is generally sufficient. |
| 15 |
|
| 16 |
-- |
| 17 |
Joost |
Archives