1 |
On Samstag 05 September 2009, Nikos Chantziaras wrote: |
2 |
> On 09/05/2009 05:59 PM, Volker Armin Hemmann wrote: |
3 |
> >> 1000 Hz timer freq |
4 |
> > |
5 |
> > change that to 300 |
6 |
> > |
7 |
> >> Did you mean tickless system with "noticks"? I have this enabled ATM |
8 |
> > |
9 |
> > deactivate that. |
10 |
> |
11 |
> Even with that, there still are problems. With composite enabled, move |
12 |
> an mplayer window around and see how the video starts to skip big |
13 |
> amounts of frames at the moment you start moving and when you "drop" it |
14 |
> again. The compositor takes away CPU time and mplayer starves for a |
15 |
> short time. BFS solves this. |
16 |
|
17 |
nope. No drops. vlc, xine, mplayer. At least no visible drop - and none of the |
18 |
three is complaining. |
19 |
|
20 |
But there is a pro-tip: use a non-broken X. aka one with |
21 |
|
22 |
fedora_dont_backfill_bg_none.patch |
23 |
|
24 |
> |
25 |
> Also, have you considered that you got it all backwards? The kernel |
26 |
> configuration tells you that for lower latencies, you should use 1000Hz |
27 |
> and PREEMPT. It even says "Desktop" right there. Why should I take |
28 |
> your word over that of the kernel devs who actually wrote that code? |
29 |
|
30 |
low latency means bad throughput and that hurts IO. |
31 |
|
32 |
|
33 |
> |
34 |
> > if that does not help: |
35 |
> >> And with extX I assume you meant the file systems? I'm aware that ext3 |
36 |
> >> is not very efficient with large files, but I can't/don't want to use |
37 |
> >> ext4 yet because I need to access the partition from windows. |
38 |
> > |
39 |
> > neither use ext3 nor ext4. |
40 |
> |
41 |
> The I/O blockage has nothing to do with the CPU scheduler. Or at least |
42 |
> not much. The "GUI freezes during file copy" problem is another beast. |
43 |
> BFS doesn't solve that. |
44 |
> |
45 |
|
46 |
it is a mixture of cpu-scheduler, 'harddisk'-scheduler, filesystem, drivers. |