1 |
On 09/05/2009 05:59 PM, Volker Armin Hemmann wrote: |
2 |
>> 1000 Hz timer freq |
3 |
> |
4 |
> change that to 300 |
5 |
> |
6 |
>> Did you mean tickless system with "noticks"? I have this enabled ATM |
7 |
> |
8 |
> deactivate that. |
9 |
|
10 |
Even with that, there still are problems. With composite enabled, move |
11 |
an mplayer window around and see how the video starts to skip big |
12 |
amounts of frames at the moment you start moving and when you "drop" it |
13 |
again. The compositor takes away CPU time and mplayer starves for a |
14 |
short time. BFS solves this. |
15 |
|
16 |
Also, have you considered that you got it all backwards? The kernel |
17 |
configuration tells you that for lower latencies, you should use 1000Hz |
18 |
and PREEMPT. It even says "Desktop" right there. Why should I take |
19 |
your word over that of the kernel devs who actually wrote that code? |
20 |
|
21 |
|
22 |
> if that does not help: |
23 |
> |
24 |
>> And with extX I assume you meant the file systems? I'm aware that ext3 is |
25 |
>> not very efficient with large files, but I can't/don't want to use ext4 |
26 |
>> yet because I need to access the partition from windows. |
27 |
> |
28 |
> neither use ext3 nor ext4. |
29 |
|
30 |
The I/O blockage has nothing to do with the CPU scheduler. Or at least |
31 |
not much. The "GUI freezes during file copy" problem is another beast. |
32 |
BFS doesn't solve that. |