1 |
On Mon, Aug 16, 2010 at 12:35 AM, Stroller |
2 |
<stroller@××××××××××××××××××.uk>wrote: |
3 |
|
4 |
> |
5 |
> On 16 Aug 2010, at 04:02, Kevin O'Gorman wrote: |
6 |
> |
7 |
>> ... |
8 |
>> |
9 |
>> My underling thing, if anyone can make other suggestions, is that my |
10 |
>> camera broke, and I had to get one in a hurry, and didn't really know what |
11 |
>> to look for. I wound up with a fairly good Sanyo 1080p camera and video |
12 |
>> recorder that's super light, and not too expensive. The problem is that its |
13 |
>> videos are MP4s, which are definitely not ready to put on a web site, and I |
14 |
>> know nothing about transcoding. My previous camera took acceptable .avi |
15 |
>> videos, which had worked with most folks browsers. The MP4s are huge and in |
16 |
>> a weakly supported format. |
17 |
>> |
18 |
> |
19 |
> MP4 is a much better container format than .avi. |
20 |
> |
21 |
> I previously discussed this a little in July's "viewing .m4v files with |
22 |
> totem" thread: |
23 |
> http://www.mail-archive.com/gentoo-user@l.g.o/msg103363.html |
24 |
> |
25 |
> Use the `mplayer -identify` command given there to determine the codec of |
26 |
> your video. |
27 |
> |
28 |
> Stroller. |
29 |
> |
30 |
> |
31 |
The codec is H.264, which most of my readers don't have. They are |
32 |
non-technical which makes it a major pain, and I want out of it. |
33 |
|
34 |
-- |
35 |
Kevin O'Gorman, PhD |