| 1 |
On 07/07/2011 02:06 AM, Dale wrote: |
| 2 |
> Volker Armin Hemmann wrote: |
| 3 |
>> |
| 4 |
>> and/or take the whole mess to -dev... |
| 5 |
>> |
| 6 |
>> I couldn't care less about gtk stuff - but forcing gtk3 just because - |
| 7 |
>> and |
| 8 |
>> that on a package where gtk3 is the worse choice... not a smart move. |
| 9 |
>> |
| 10 |
> |
| 11 |
> This sounds like the move KDE made with KDE4. I have some gtk stuff on |
| 12 |
> here but I'm not sure how much I actually use it. The new version may be |
| 13 |
> good one day but if it is not ready yet, why not wait until it is? |
| 14 |
|
| 15 |
This is not about Gnome though. It's about Gtk. And portage never |
| 16 |
removed older versions, unlike Qt. Try: |
| 17 |
|
| 18 |
eix -e gtk+ |
| 19 |
|
| 20 |
Hell, there's still version 1.2.10 lurking in there! What are the |
| 21 |
chances there would be a Qt 1.x in portage? |
Archives