1 |
On Thu, Apr 17 2014, Jc García wrote: |
2 |
|
3 |
> 2014-04-17 10:11 GMT-06:00 <gottlieb@×××.edu>: |
4 |
>> I am a CS prof at NYU, which uses Java for CS 101. I have taught this |
5 |
>> course a few times and have learned Java as a result. During my |
6 |
>> sabbatical year (a coincidence? :-) )the department decided to teach the |
7 |
>> eclipse IDE. |
8 |
>> |
9 |
>> I have never used an IDE so though i should try now instead of waiting |
10 |
>> until september. |
11 |
>> |
12 |
>> merging eclipse-ecj was painless and sure enough it does seem to compile |
13 |
>> my programs. It even noticed that I didn't close a scanner. |
14 |
>> I can still use javac if desired. Fine. |
15 |
> |
16 |
> I am a CS student, and use eclipse for java projects, and I can say it |
17 |
> has some nice things to work java. |
18 |
> |
19 |
>> |
20 |
>> I have not yet merged eclipse-sdk. Must I merge this? The only version |
21 |
>> in the main tree is masked and it brings in 83! packages. |
22 |
>> |
23 |
> |
24 |
> The portage version of eclipse is old, I personally prefer to use the |
25 |
> binary tarball from eclipse.org( It doesn't worth it for me having to |
26 |
> compile a large old thing) |
27 |
> |
28 |
>> Others in the dept (and students) praise the eclipse debugger. I don't |
29 |
>> see how I will be invoking it. Also what about the eclipse editor? |
30 |
>> |
31 |
> Well I got used to vim before using java and eclipse, so its editor in |
32 |
> my opinion sucks(after you have used a real editor), but fortunately |
33 |
> there is eclim, which lets you use your favorite editor(vim or emacs) |
34 |
> to code, and have acces to the nice features of eclipse, so it was the |
35 |
> option for me when coding java. (None of eclim's versions work with |
36 |
> the portage in-tree eclipse version, so another reason to use the |
37 |
> binary tarball) |
38 |
> |
39 |
>> I guess, I need to be pointed at the right documentation. I went to |
40 |
>> wiki.eclipse.org but am not sure where to go to from here. |
41 |
>> |
42 |
>> thanks, |
43 |
>> allan |
44 |
>> |
45 |
> I don't really like IDEs nor java, and avoid it most of the time, so i |
46 |
> don't have much experience with it, but for a gentoo user who has been |
47 |
> around sometime, I would strongly recomend the combination |
48 |
> eclipse+eclim+your_editor, it would make you not hate the GUI, and get |
49 |
> the nice features. |
50 |
|
51 |
Thank you; that does seem preferable. Is the binary you refer to the |
52 |
one in the following message from emerge (I did a --pretend)? |
53 |
|
54 |
# A more recent source build maintained by the community is available in the |
55 |
# seden overlay. A more recent binary is available in the java-overlay. |
56 |
|
57 |
thanks again, |
58 |
allan |