| 1 |
Michael wrote: |
| 2 |
> On Saturday, 6 August 2022 07:07:26 BST Dale wrote: |
| 3 |
> |
| 4 |
>> Well, that settles that then. I guess it will be Surfshark. Pretty |
| 5 |
>> sure it is in the Netherlands but may be wrong on country. I just |
| 6 |
>> recall it being outside US jurisdiction. I also read they have been |
| 7 |
>> audited by independent people to ensure they have no logs even if asked. |
| 8 |
> Surfshark gets good reviews and it offers the wireguard protocol with the |
| 9 |
> ChaCha20 cipher for better encryption and performance. However, the |
| 10 |
> Netherlands is part of the EU and 14 eyes, so I would think similar state |
| 11 |
> powers exist to access your private communications and the ISPs would have no |
| 12 |
> way of refusing and staying in business. Surfshark offers a warrant canary, |
| 13 |
> but it looks more like a marketing statement to me when you compare it to |
| 14 |
> something like the Qubes digitally signed canaries. |
| 15 |
|
| 16 |
|
| 17 |
I forgot about the 14 eyes thing. Do you know of one outside that that |
| 18 |
is good? The bad thing about most, they are pricey if done by the month |
| 19 |
for testing. You only get a good deal if you subscribe for a year or |
| 20 |
even two years. I don't want to subscribe and then find out it is a bad |
| 21 |
one. |
| 22 |
|
| 23 |
Dale |
| 24 |
|
| 25 |
:-) :-) |
Archives