1 |
2015-05-16 11:55 GMT+03:00 Mick <michaelkintzios@×××××.com>: |
2 |
> On Saturday 16 May 2015 09:26:14 gevisz wrote: |
3 |
>> 2015-05-16 10:51 GMT+03:00 gevisz <gevisz@×××××.com>: |
4 |
> |
5 |
>> > So, if I get no better suggestions, I will enable abi_x86_32 |
6 |
>> > globally and try to update the world once more. |
7 |
>> |
8 |
>> Lukily, this approach worked out. Currently I am updating and recompiling |
9 |
>> 199 packages but the blockers disappeared. |
10 |
>> |
11 |
>> > If that will not work, I will remove the libav USE flag from |
12 |
>> > /etc/portage/make.conf and try to update the world for the last |
13 |
>> > time. |
14 |
>> |
15 |
>> Now, when everything ended well, I can accept that by the phrase |
16 |
>> "to update the world for the last time" above I meant that I was going |
17 |
>> to switch to other Linux distribution if this issue with |
18 |
>> ffmpeg-libav-multilib could not be solved in an elegant way, that is, |
19 |
>> without poking with every single package, which is really ugly. |
20 |
>> |
21 |
>> Luckily, everything ended well and I am happy to stay with Gentoo, |
22 |
>> but I should mention that, having such issues with multilib profile, |
23 |
>> enabling abi_x86_32 on per package base really should be unrecommended |
24 |
>> way to maintain the system and users should be warned about it. |
25 |
> |
26 |
> I'm afraid I cannot agree with you on this. On older PCs I would rather did |
27 |
> not have to install abi_x86_32 for packages that I don't need to. The |
28 |
> granular approach suits me better and also aligns better with the light-footed |
29 |
> Gentoo approach. |
30 |
|
31 |
With this "light-footed approach" I had about two full-screen rubbish |
32 |
in my /etc/portage/make.conf file and kept adding on almost every update. |
33 |
|
34 |
> I think had you followed my suggestion you could have found that |
35 |
> by remerging half a dozen packages at most, your conflict would |
36 |
> have been resolved. |
37 |
|
38 |
I think so, but this is what I call ugly. |
39 |
|
40 |
> Either way you got a result, so whatever works. :-) |
41 |
|
42 |
Yes, thank you. |