1 |
On Thu, Feb 8, 2018 at 6:18 PM, Wol's lists <antlists@××××××××××××.uk> wrote: |
2 |
> |
3 |
> /var/tmp is defined as the place where programs store stuff like crash |
4 |
> recovery files. Mounting it tmpfs is going to screw up any programs that |
5 |
> reply on that *defined* behaviour to recover after a crash. |
6 |
> |
7 |
|
8 |
Care to cite an example of such a program in the Gentoo repo? I |
9 |
certainly can't think of any, and I've been running with /var/tmp on |
10 |
tmpfs for over a decade. |
11 |
|
12 |
/var/cache strikes me as a much better place for some kind of recovery |
13 |
file. While /var/tmp is typically less volatile than /tmp, it isn't |
14 |
really something that software should just rely on. |
15 |
|
16 |
Perhaps FHS says otherwise, but anybody relying on FHS is going to get |
17 |
burned because lots of distros purge /var/tmp. The problem with FHS |
18 |
is that nobody really bothers to try to update it any longer. |
19 |
Certainly people think twice before deviating it, but they still do |
20 |
from time to time, usually in the same ways that other distros |
21 |
deviate. |
22 |
|
23 |
-- |
24 |
Rich |