Gentoo Archives: gentoo-user

From: Mark Knecht <markknecht@×××××.com>
To: Gentoo User <gentoo-user@l.g.o>
Subject: Re: [gentoo-user] Good/better/best filesystem for large, static video library?
Date: Tue, 25 Dec 2012 17:08:51
Message-Id: CAK2H+ecq2u3=+6MsVB9E=BBaLXFiWtMniG3Z429TZROizEH5_w@mail.gmail.com
In Reply to: Re: [gentoo-user] Good/better/best filesystem for large, static video library? by Pandu Poluan
1 On Tue, Dec 25, 2012 at 8:33 AM, Pandu Poluan <pandu@××××××.info> wrote:
2 >
3 > On Dec 25, 2012 10:44 PM, "Mark Knecht" <markknecht@×××××.com> wrote:
4 <SNIP>
5 >> With the previous local drive I used ext3 and have had no problems.
6 >> I'm just wondering if there's a better choice & why.
7 <SNIP>
8 >
9 > For your usage, I think ext3 is the most suitable.
10 >
11 > Do you have another fs in mind?
12
13 Really, no. ext3 has been fine. I didn't see any real advantage to
14 ext4 myself. Florian offers the removal argument but I've never
15 removed files from this database. It's just movies so the systems just
16 grows over time.
17
18 I suppose I wondered whether some other filesystem might get through
19 an fsck _much_ faster. This machine gets shut down in the evening so
20 fsck operations happen roughly once a month. At times I need to get up
21 and running in the morning and get held up behind an fsck after so
22 many days.
23
24 Other than that I don't have any real issues, and presupposing that
25 ext3 would be my final choice I put it on and started rsyncing the
26 files, but if another answer is really better I have no problems with
27 blowing that away and starting again.
28
29 Thanks,
30 Mark

Replies

Subject Author
Re: [gentoo-user] Good/better/best filesystem for large, static video library? Michael Orlitzky <michael@××××××××.com>