| 1 |
On Sun, 27 Nov 2011 00:01:07 +0100, Alex Schuster wrote: |
| 2 |
|
| 3 |
> > Seriously, LVM looks mighty nice, but it also looks (and is!) mighty |
| 4 |
> > complex. |
| 5 |
> |
| 6 |
> I really don't think so. pvcreate <partition> creates a physical volume, |
| 7 |
> vgcreate <vgname> <partition> starts a volume group, and lvcreate -n |
| 8 |
> <name> -L <size> <vgname> creates a logical volume that you can use as |
| 9 |
> if it were a physical partition. |
| 10 |
|
| 11 |
The problem people have with LVM is not working with PVs, VGs and LVs, it |
| 12 |
is understanding what they are and how they fit together. Once that is |
| 13 |
clear, the system becomes as simple as you stated. |
| 14 |
|
| 15 |
|
| 16 |
-- |
| 17 |
Neil Bothwick |
| 18 |
|
| 19 |
I cna ytpe 300 wrods pre mniuet!!! |
Archives