1 |
On Sat, Nov 26, 2011 at 3:32 PM, Neil Bothwick <neil@××××××××××.uk> wrote: |
2 |
> On Sun, 27 Nov 2011 00:01:07 +0100, Alex Schuster wrote: |
3 |
> |
4 |
>> > Seriously, LVM looks mighty nice, but it also looks (and is!) mighty |
5 |
>> > complex. |
6 |
>> |
7 |
>> I really don't think so. pvcreate <partition> creates a physical volume, |
8 |
>> vgcreate <vgname> <partition> starts a volume group, and lvcreate -n |
9 |
>> <name> -L <size> <vgname> creates a logical volume that you can use as |
10 |
>> if it were a physical partition. |
11 |
> |
12 |
> The problem people have with LVM is not working with PVs, VGs and LVs, it |
13 |
> is understanding what they are and how they fit together. Once that is |
14 |
> clear, the system becomes as simple as you stated. |
15 |
> |
16 |
> |
17 |
> -- |
18 |
> Neil Bothwick |
19 |
|
20 |
I have a machine I built a couple of years ago that has a good Intel |
21 |
MB & processor (i5-661) from that time frame, and the machine already |
22 |
has Gentoo on it, but the hard drives where more or less what I had |
23 |
hanging around at the time so it ended up with 4 smallish drives. 3 |
24 |
for Gentoo, 1 for Windows. Would it be a reasonable training exercise |
25 |
to take a new 1TB drive and do some sort of rsync copy of those 3 |
26 |
drives into some sort of a LVM and see how it works? |
27 |
|
28 |
- Mark |