1 |
Arttu V. wrote: |
2 |
> Dale wrote: |
3 |
> > You may want to look into that setting for next time. I did however |
4 |
> > notice that although python is in the system set, it is not saving a |
5 |
> > copy for some reason. Anybody know why this setting is not working? |
6 |
> > |
7 |
> > FEATURES="--keep-going buildsyspkg sandbox fixpackages" |
8 |
> > |
9 |
> > Is the buildsyspkg option not valid anymore? |
10 |
> |
11 |
> http://sources.gentoo.org/viewcvs.py/gentoo-x86/profiles/base/packages?r1=1.40&r2=1.41 |
12 |
> |
13 |
> |
14 |
> Python appears to be gone from the base system? Or maybe I'm looking |
15 |
> at the wrong file? Anyway, 'emerge -pv @system | grep python' would |
16 |
> seem to agree here. |
17 |
> |
18 |
> Now I don't have a PhD in Gentoo Package Manglement (barely passed the |
19 |
> kindergarten level so far?), but that commit looks rather unsettling |
20 |
> for other parts as well. Are the devs switching over to paludis in |
21 |
> droves? Or why is sys-apps/portage commented out as well? Why is it |
22 |
> replaced by the hard-coded ("old-style"?) virtual/portage? |
23 |
> |
24 |
|
25 |
This is what I get with this command: |
26 |
|
27 |
root@smoker / # emerge -ep system | grep python |
28 |
[ebuild R ] app-admin/python-updater-0.5 |
29 |
[ebuild R ] dev-lang/python-2.5.4-r2 |
30 |
root@smoker / # |
31 |
|
32 |
So python is there if you do it emptytree. I still don't have a binary |
33 |
of this in packages/All tho. Also, since portage has to have python, |
34 |
why is it not saving this? I put that line in make.conf just in case I |
35 |
do something like the OP did by mistake. It appears that this isn't |
36 |
working. |
37 |
|
38 |
Ideas? This a bug? |
39 |
|
40 |
Dale |
41 |
|
42 |
:-) :-) |
43 |
|
44 |
P. S. No PhD here either. |