Gentoo Archives: gentoo-user

From: "Eric S. Johansson" <esj@××××××.org>
To: gentoo-user@l.g.o
Subject: Re: [gentoo-user] building without X
Date: Wed, 08 Dec 2004 02:05:47
Message-Id: 41B6615C.2010003@harvee.org
In Reply to: Re: [gentoo-user] building without X by Uwe Thiem
1 Uwe Thiem wrote:
2
3 > Lemme guess. You are building a server for thing clients otherwise the
4 > statement above wouldn't make much sense. Alright, I will assume that.
5
6 effectively right but there are other models where this would fit.
7 think colinux systems.
8 >
9 > The X applications still need all the X-related libs to link against. So you
10 > better build the whole X.
11 >
12 >>If it is impossible to split X11 into client and server packages, then I
13 >>would need some help figuring out why it is dying on two security
14 >>related functions.
15 >
16 >
17 > So, what are those issues?
18
19 ../../programs/Xserver/hw/xfree86/loader/libloader.a(xf86sym.o)(.data+0x124c):
20 undefined reference to `__stack_smash_handler'
21 ../../programs/Xserver/hw/xfree86/loader/libloader.a(xf86sym.o)(.data+0x1254):
22 undefined reference to `__guard'
23 collect2: ld returned 1 exit status
24
25
26 someone else claimed that emerge sync and rebuilding glibc fixed the
27 problem. trying that now.
28
29 --- eric
30
31
32 --
33 "Part of the problem with the Wal-Mart business model is that it
34 requires more poverty in order to grow."
35
36 http://www.salon.com/mwt/feature/2004/11/22/wal_mart/print.html
37
38 --
39 gentoo-user@g.o mailing list

Replies

Subject Author
RE: [gentoo-user] building without X Michael Kintzios <michaelkintzios@××××××××.uk>