1 |
On 02/04/2013 19:51, Davide Carnovale wrote: |
2 |
> Hi all gentoo people! |
3 |
> I've been away from gentoo for a while, and I'm in the process of |
4 |
> reinstalling it today. |
5 |
> While downloading the stage 3 I noticed that only an i486 version is |
6 |
> available. As far as I remember, gentoo was best known, back in the |
7 |
> days, for being fast, as it was one of the first distro to support |
8 |
> i686... am i wrong with this? if not, why only i486 today? |
9 |
> |
10 |
> apart from the reasons behind the decision of shipping only an i486 |
11 |
> stage 3, do you think it's worth the pain to recompile everything |
12 |
> (like the old stage1) for a different arch? i have an intel i5 |
13 |
> processor. |
14 |
|
15 |
You have been gone a while :-) |
16 |
|
17 |
These days we don't do the whole stage 1/2/3 thing while rebuilding the |
18 |
whole lot multiple times. |
19 |
|
20 |
Nowadays we just unpack a suitable stage 3 into a chroot, tweak CFLAGS, |
21 |
"emerge -e world", then emerge all the packages you use. |
22 |
|
23 |
The stage3 tarballs are normally quite out of date so you will rebuild |
24 |
the whole lot anyway asap. If your workstation is also your buildhost, |
25 |
the bests start for CFLAGS with a reasonably recent gcc is |
26 |
|
27 |
CFLAGS="-march=native -O2 -pipe" |
28 |
|
29 |
and CHOST, as always, is something you should not be touching at all. |
30 |
|
31 |
IOW, as long as you start with the desired ABI (32 vs 64 bit) your first |
32 |
update is going to optimize and fix things anyway. So don't wprry about it. |
33 |
|
34 |
Oh, and "gentoo is fast" is a nono swear word these days. That's ricing |
35 |
:-) Nowadays we say the benefit of gentoo is USE so you get what *you* |
36 |
want :-) |
37 |
|
38 |
|
39 |
|
40 |
|
41 |
-- |
42 |
Alan McKinnon |
43 |
alan.mckinnon@×××××.com |