Gentoo Archives: gentoo-user

From: felix@×××××××.com
To: gentoo-user@l.g.o
Subject: Re: [gentoo-user] Getting around ancient SATA disk size limitations
Date: Tue, 19 Jun 2012 16:07:40
Message-Id: 20120619160537.GA29447@crowfix.com
In Reply to: Re: [gentoo-user] Getting around ancient SATA disk size limitations by Michael Mol
1 On Tue, Jun 19, 2012 at 10:49:48AM -0400, Michael Mol wrote:
2 > A thought...if the system is old enough that it only has PCI and PCI-X
3 > (as opposed to PCIe), then it's definitely not going to have USB3.
4 >
5 > Perhaps putting attaching the USB3 enclosure to the system by way of a
6 > USB2 hub might work?
7
8 No USB 3 on the motherboard. I tried a USB 3 enclosure but got zero
9 response from Linux when plugging it in. Didn't even show up in
10 /var/log/messages.
11
12 --
13 ... _._. ._ ._. . _._. ._. ___ .__ ._. . .__. ._ .. ._.
14 Felix Finch: scarecrow repairman & rocket surgeon / felix@×××××××.com
15 GPG = E987 4493 C860 246C 3B1E 6477 7838 76E9 182E 8151 ITAR license #4933
16 I've found a solution to Fermat's Last Theorem but I see I've run out of room o

Replies

Subject Author
Re: [gentoo-user] Getting around ancient SATA disk size limitations Michael Mol <mikemol@×××××.com>