Gentoo Archives: gentoo-user

From: BRM <bm_witness@×××××.com>
To: gentoo-user@l.g.o
Subject: Re: [gentoo-user] Re: Removing KDE 3.5? Or reason to keep it around?
Date: Fri, 26 Feb 2010 16:11:03
Message-Id: 399126.91449.qm@web65404.mail.ac4.yahoo.com
In Reply to: Re: [gentoo-user] Re: Removing KDE 3.5? Or reason to keep it around? by Alex Schuster
1 ----- Original Message ----
2
3 > From: Alex Schuster <wonko@×××××××××.org>
4 > To: gentoo-user@l.g.o
5 > BRM writes:
6 > > > > If you keep your world file (/var/lib/portage/world) tidy, simply
7 > > > > deleting all lines with KDE3 packages and running emerge -a --
8 > > > > depclean will take care of it.
9 > > > > You *do* keep your world file tidy, don't you? :P
10 > > > That would be the easiest method. If you use the kde-meta package
11 > > > like I do, just remove the one for KDE 3 and let --depclean do its
12 > > > thing. It should get all of it.
13 > > I actually don't touch the world file, and just do the 'emerge world
14 > > -vuDNa' for updates. From my POV, that is emerge/Portage's job - not
15 > > mine.
16 > I'd also leave the world file alone, and emerge -C the packages I want
17 > removed.
18
19 Yep, that's what I do.
20
21 > > Aside from that, I'm not sure I have ever really run "emerge
22 > > --depclean", but I also rarely uninstall anything, but don't install
23 > > things left or right to try out either, so typically upgrades are all
24 > > I need to do.
25 > > Having just done a compiler upgrade, I can say that there are roughly
26 > > 1100 packages (emerge -eav) in world that were recompiled.
27 > > I was just contemplating - KDE4 is stable, and I don't see myself
28 > > running KDE3 again; so why keep it around. If 'emerge world -vuDNa'
29 > > will remove it when it gets pushed off the main trunk, then that's
30 > > probably fine with me - since that seems to not be very far out now.
31 > > If not, then I definitely want to remove it now as there is no other
32 > > reason for keeping it around.
33 > KDE3 is no longer in the portage tree, it's in the kde-sunset overlay.
34 >
35 > World updates do not remove things, you need to use emerge --depclean for
36 > this. It will probably want to remove a lot when you never depcleaned
37 > before, so be sure to check. Put the stuff you want to keep in your world
38 > file with emerge -n, then depclean the rest. I guess it will remove your
39 > whole KDE3 that is no longer in portage. If you like to keep it, add the
40 > kde-sunset overlay with laymanl, and maybe emerge kde-base/kde-meta:3.5.
41
42 Thanks. That's what I needed to know.
43
44 > > That's the only issue. My only concern is software (e.g. KDevelop) that
45 > > may not have been updated to KDE4 yet. (Not a fan of KDevelop3;
46 > > waiting to see how KDevelop4 is going to shape up.)
47 > The KDE4 version is in the kde overlay, but I do not know if it is usable
48 > already.
49
50 For now, I'll wait. I mostly use vim; and having done a lot of Windows stuff for work I am familiar with VS.
51 While there are a lot of things I don't like about VS, nothing else seems to quite compare.
52 KDevelop3 at least drove me nuts; and Eclipse just doesn't do well when you're not programming in Java - I have yet to get CDT to work, though I've mostly tried on Windows.
53 QtCreator seems to be on the right track, though it's still quite early.
54
55 I'm interested to see how KDevelop4 is going to turn out, but I'll certainly wait for it to reach the mainline tree.
56
57 Thanks for the info.
58
59 Ben

Replies

Subject Author
[gentoo-user] Re: Removing KDE 3.5? Or reason to keep it around? Nikos Chantziaras <realnc@×××××.de>