1 |
--- On Sun, 27/12/09, Alan McKinnon <alan.mckinnon@×××××.com> wrote: |
2 |
|
3 |
> From: Alan McKinnon <alan.mckinnon@×××××.com> |
4 |
> Subject: Re: [gentoo-user] Upgrade or start over.. |
5 |
> To: gentoo-user@l.g.o |
6 |
> Date: Sunday, 27 December, 2009, 22:24 |
7 |
> On Sunday 27 December 2009 21:46:23 |
8 |
> Jon Hardcastle wrote: |
9 |
> > Hi all, |
10 |
> > |
11 |
> > I have a gentoo circa 2008 install that i have pretty |
12 |
> much the bare minimal |
13 |
> > to keep up to date... i now have the problem |
14 |
> that i need to upgrade mdadm, |
15 |
> > lvm and probably a few other bits and pieces. |
16 |
> This machine is used almost |
17 |
> > exclusively as a windows file server. |
18 |
> > |
19 |
> > I am getting blocks all over the show and lots of |
20 |
> applications needs |
21 |
> > reinstalling/upgradining on a emerge world. i |
22 |
> have also had problems |
23 |
> > getting the kernel to do what it needs to do a i |
24 |
> installed the minimal |
25 |
> > when i started.. |
26 |
> > |
27 |
> > So i am wondering... it is easier to try and upgrade |
28 |
> it, or as i have 2 |
29 |
> > raid 1 drives as the operating system drives and |
30 |
> the rest of the drives |
31 |
> > are pure data, i can disconnect one and wipe the |
32 |
> other reinstall from |
33 |
> > fresh as a degraded raid 1 and when i know we |
34 |
> are good to go, wipe the |
35 |
> > disconnected drive and add to the array to |
36 |
> resync and go from there? |
37 |
> |
38 |
> the mdadm/lvm blocks are easy to fix, just unmerge mdadm |
39 |
> and merge lvm. |
40 |
> |
41 |
> Then upgrade portage to latest *masked* version (it's |
42 |
> stable and trouble-free |
43 |
> despite the classification), and most of the remaining |
44 |
> blockers should be |
45 |
> resolved automatically by portage. Depending on what |
46 |
> remains, you may or may |
47 |
> not decide to proceed with an upgrade as opposed to a |
48 |
> reinstall. |
49 |
> |
50 |
> But it's only one year back, shouldn't give too much |
51 |
> trouble on a minimalist |
52 |
> system. Off the top of my head, I can only really think of |
53 |
> the monolithic to |
54 |
> split ebuild samba split |
55 |
> |
56 |
> |
57 |
> -- |
58 |
> alan dot mckinnon at gmail dot com |
59 |
> |
60 |
> |
61 |
|
62 |
I absolutely depend on mdadm/lvm (which i believe require in some way devicemapper and udev) and these are the biggest things i am worried about changing. Does anyone have any experience here? I am assuming that unmerging and remerging should be relatively problem free? If i can get these bad boys upto date that is all i really care about... |