1 |
Dale <rdalek1967@×××××.com> [14-07-27 14:36]: |
2 |
> meino.cramer@×××.de wrote: |
3 |
> > Back to the initial problem: How can I offline test the rest of the |
4 |
> > disk if the first bad sector (10%) of the surface breaks the test with |
5 |
> > an error? Best regards, mcc |
6 |
> |
7 |
> I never got mine to go past the first failure until I used dd to erase |
8 |
> the drive. As mentioned before, I may could have done that without |
9 |
> moving my data but that was to complicated and risky for me at the |
10 |
> time. From my understanding tho, until that data is moved off the bad |
11 |
> spot so that the drive knows it can do what it needs to, that spot is |
12 |
> still going to show up. I don't know of a way to make it test beyond |
13 |
> the bad spot either. |
14 |
> |
15 |
> If you have a drive that you can move that data over to so that you can |
16 |
> play with the bad drive, that's what I would do. Once you get it moved, |
17 |
> then dd the whole drive, run the test and then see what results you |
18 |
> get. I looked at a howto that someone posted or I found and doing it |
19 |
> with the data on there just made me nervous. |
20 |
> |
21 |
> I'm running out of info here. Anyone else provide more help than me? |
22 |
> |
23 |
> Dale |
24 |
> |
25 |
> :-) :-) |
26 |
> |
27 |
|
28 |
Hi Dale, |
29 |
|
30 |
thanks for the info... |
31 |
|
32 |
I already did this. PLEASE read my previous posting completly. |
33 |
|
34 |
dd failed with an I/O error at that spot. |