Gentoo Archives: gentoo-user

From: Dale <rdalek1967@×××××.com>
To: gentoo-user@l.g.o
Subject: Re: [gentoo-user] Contradictionary behaviour of SMART on hds ?!?
Date: Sun, 27 Jul 2014 12:34:03
Message-Id: 53D4F1AF.3010305@gmail.com
In Reply to: Re: [gentoo-user] Contradictionary behaviour of SMART on hds ?!? by meino.cramer@gmx.de
1 meino.cramer@×××.de wrote:
2 > Back to the initial problem: How can I offline test the rest of the
3 > disk if the first bad sector (10%) of the surface breaks the test with
4 > an error? Best regards, mcc
5
6 I never got mine to go past the first failure until I used dd to erase
7 the drive. As mentioned before, I may could have done that without
8 moving my data but that was to complicated and risky for me at the
9 time. From my understanding tho, until that data is moved off the bad
10 spot so that the drive knows it can do what it needs to, that spot is
11 still going to show up. I don't know of a way to make it test beyond
12 the bad spot either.
13
14 If you have a drive that you can move that data over to so that you can
15 play with the bad drive, that's what I would do. Once you get it moved,
16 then dd the whole drive, run the test and then see what results you
17 get. I looked at a howto that someone posted or I found and doing it
18 with the data on there just made me nervous.
19
20 I'm running out of info here. Anyone else provide more help than me?
21
22 Dale
23
24 :-) :-)

Replies