1 |
Nicolas Sebrecht wrote: |
2 |
> Steven J. Long wrote: |
3 |
> > > Again, I proposed myself to the dev list two times in the past. Nobody |
4 |
> > > cared and I had no answers. |
5 |
> > |
6 |
> > Because that has never been the process: anyone can post to the mailing-list, it |
7 |
> > doesn't mean anything. While I agree it would have been good if recruiters had |
8 |
> > followed it up with you.. |
9 |
.. |
10 |
> > Neither of those change the fact that you don't join a team just by sending them |
11 |
> > an email. Like it or not, there are social factors involved, or it wouldn't be |
12 |
> > a team of people, however loosely associated. |
13 |
> |
14 |
> If social factours is important, it is not just that FMPOV. |
15 |
|
16 |
I never said it was though, did I? However you cannot just ignore those social factors, |
17 |
however much you might prefer to. You must know that from work, so why is this so hard to |
18 |
accept? |
19 |
|
20 |
> Anyway, you |
21 |
> seems to think the way Gentoo shares code and knowledge is good enough |
22 |
> as-is to have contributors and new developers. |
23 |
|
24 |
Another strawman, after I've just stated: |
25 |
|
26 |
"Please don't get me wrong: I think the recruitment process could be improved.. that does |
27 |
take a cultural shift." |
28 |
|
29 |
Again you appear to be reacting emotionally. Feel free to have a hissy-fit: that's the kind |
30 |
of thing that turns people off you. |
31 |
|
32 |
Not sure what you mean about "sharing code": it's all mirrored across the world multiple |
33 |
times so I don't really recognise your point about a deficit of sharing. |
34 |
|
35 |
> Fine. I don't think so and the other contributions to this thread confort me in my opinion. |
36 |
|
37 |
Yes well, somehow I think you're more interested in comfort for your opinions, most especially |
38 |
of yourself, than actually moving anything forward for everyone. |
39 |
|
40 |
> Please, take the critism the constructive way. The topic is not about me. |
41 |
|
42 |
The same goes for you: and it was about you, since all you wanted to discuss were how your |
43 |
two emails (the effort!) were ignored, and then draw wide-ranging conclusions that were |
44 |
non-sequitur. |
45 |
|
46 |
I did try to discuss what actually happens, and where you went wrong. You haven't considered |
47 |
what I've said, only used it as reason for spurious argument. |
48 |
|
49 |
> Pointing out my "hand-holding", "ego-stroking" or whatever looks |
50 |
> pointless. |
51 |
|
52 |
I wasn't: I was pointing out your apparent need for those, which seems to have continued |
53 |
into this email. |
54 |
|
55 |
You've turned it into about what a great "developer" you are, and how much we're missing |
56 |
by not having your "contribution". Even though I specifically stated: |
57 |
|
58 |
"Please note I'm not discussing any technical ability you may or may not have." |
59 |
|
60 |
> I know the basics. |
61 |
|
62 |
Again you're wilfully misinterpreting what I've said, and answering a completely different |
63 |
point. You didn't know the basics of how to go about approaching Gentoo. Stuff that |
64 |
practically every user knows, or can find out *very* easily: much more easily than the |
65 |
documentation they end up searching to do an install and maintain their machine/s. Again, |
66 |
if you cba to do that basic groundwork, wtf do you expect? |
67 |
|
68 |
Oh yes, us all to fall over ourselves and fete you with discussion about how wonderful you |
69 |
are, and how lucky we'd be if you only deigned to contribute some of your wisdom to us mere |
70 |
mortals. So much so that we ignore all the usual metrics, and take your email as gospel |
71 |
truth, that overrides whether you are actually a good fit for Gentoo, or even whether you |
72 |
can lookup docs on a website, let alone have actually contributed as part of the community. |
73 |
|
74 |
Good luck with that approach, and your current projects. |
75 |
|
76 |
-- |
77 |
#friendly-coders -- We're friendly, but we're not /that/ friendly ;-) |