1 |
On Mon, 1 Jan 2007 22:16:46 +0200 |
2 |
Uwe Thiem wrote: |
3 |
|
4 |
> On 01 January 2007 19:15, Boyd Stephen Smith Jr. wrote: |
5 |
> > On Monday 01 January 2007 08:16, Uwe Thiem <uwix@××××.na> wrote |
6 |
> > |
7 |
> > about '[gentoo-user] revdep-rebuild / missing ebuild': |
8 |
> > > revdep-rebuild produces a long list of binaries to be rebuilt. |
9 |
> > > Not wuite surprising since I haven't done it on that box for a |
10 |
> > > long while. Problem is it tells me that at least for one binary |
11 |
> > > no ebuild exists but it doesn't tell me which binary. Bummer! How |
12 |
> > > do I find out? |
13 |
> > |
14 |
> > ??? |
15 |
> |
16 |
> I agree. ;-) |
17 |
> |
18 |
> > |
19 |
> > Are you running with the -q option? |
20 |
> |
21 |
> No -q option here. Straight revdep-rebuild. |
22 |
> |
23 |
> > Normally in the "assigning file to |
24 |
> > packages" stage it will produce error text like "<file> not owned |
25 |
> > by any package is broken". |
26 |
> |
27 |
> Yes, I know. |
28 |
> |
29 |
> > Maybe check your output again? Or run with the -v |
30 |
> > option to see if you get any extra messages? |
31 |
> |
32 |
> I swear on a whole barrel of Windhoek Lager that it did not mention |
33 |
> any particular file. The issue is resolved meanwhile (see my other |
34 |
> mail), so I can not reproduce the same output and post it here |
35 |
> anymore. |
36 |
> |
37 |
> Uwe |
38 |
|
39 |
One can list binaries known to portage with: |
40 |
|
41 |
cat /var/db/pkg/*/*/CONTENTS | grep /usr/bin/ |
42 |
|
43 |
If that's compared to /usr/bin/*, orphaned binaries can be identified. |
44 |
|
45 |
-- |
46 |
gentoo-user@g.o mailing list |