| 1 |
I think you all are missing something... sendmail is better documented |
| 2 |
than any of the other pretenders. |
| 3 |
|
| 4 |
Now understand, that I am easily the dullest knife in the drawer on |
| 5 |
this list even though by unix/linux standards I'm fairly long in the |
| 6 |
tooth having started my computing skills in 1996 and broke in on |
| 7 |
redhat at that time (using sendmail). I'm sad to say, I'm still a |
| 8 |
noob in a vast number of areas. |
| 9 |
|
| 10 |
I've used sendmail all that time. If I can figure out how to use |
| 11 |
it.... It really must not be that hard. At least not hard to find |
| 12 |
piles of help on google. |
| 13 |
|
| 14 |
Admittedly though my usage has always been just a homeboy home lan |
| 15 |
administrator so closest I ever come to using sendmail anything like |
| 16 |
what its target usage base is, would be a home lan mailhub. |
| 17 |
|
| 18 |
Unless, I'm terribly misinformed, sendmail is still the most commonly |
| 19 |
used mta in the unix world of servers. |
| 20 |
|
| 21 |
At least according to http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sendmail |
| 22 |
|
| 23 |
Qmail home page says it is the second most common MTA but doesn't say |
| 24 |
who is first.... its sendmail... I'm pretty sure. |
| 25 |
|
| 26 |
About all the snipes concerning hacking sendmail.cf... I'm sure you |
| 27 |
are all aware that any hacking needs to happen in sendmail.mc... then |
| 28 |
let m4 sort out sendmail.cf. |
Archives