1 |
On 2016-08-30, Volker Armin Hemmann <volkerarmin@××××××××××.com> wrote: |
2 |
|
3 |
> ext2 is on every system, |
4 |
|
5 |
Unless it isn't. |
6 |
|
7 |
There's nothing in Gentoo that guarantees everybody has ext2 support |
8 |
in their kernels. That said, I agree that ext2 (or perhaps ext3 with |
9 |
journalling disabled -- I've always been a bit fuzzy on whether that's |
10 |
exactly the same thing or not) is as close to a "universal" Linux |
11 |
filesystem as you're going to get. I would guess that the percentage |
12 |
of Gentoo systems that suport ext2/3 is _way_ _way_ higher than the |
13 |
percentage that support exfat. |
14 |
|
15 |
> exfat not. ext2 is very stable, tested and well aged. exfat is some |
16 |
> fuse something crap. New, hardly tested and unstable as it gets. |
17 |
> |
18 |
> And why use exfat if you use linux? It is just not needed at all. |
19 |
|
20 |
I agree. If you want to transport something between Linux systems, |
21 |
use ext2/3 and use "mount" options to handle the permission issues. |
22 |
|
23 |
-- |
24 |
Grant Edwards grant.b.edwards Yow! JAPAN is a WONDERFUL |
25 |
at planet -- I wonder if we'll |
26 |
gmail.com ever reach their level of |
27 |
COMPARATIVE SHOPPING ... |