1 |
Am 30.08.2016 um 21:14 schrieb J. Roeleveld: |
2 |
> On August 30, 2016 8:58:17 PM GMT+02:00, Volker Armin Hemmann <volkerarmin@××××××××××.com> wrote: |
3 |
>> Am 30.08.2016 um 20:12 schrieb Alan McKinnon: |
4 |
>>> On 30/08/2016 14:04, Neil Bothwick wrote: |
5 |
>>>> On Tue, 30 Aug 2016 12:08:13 +0200, Alan McKinnon wrote: |
6 |
>>>> |
7 |
>>>>>>> ext2 doesn't have a journal, that's why I suggested it in the |
8 |
>> first |
9 |
>>>>>>> place. |
10 |
>>>>>> My point was against all the journalised filesystems (that |
11 |
>> includes |
12 |
>>>>>> NTFS), not against your advice ;) |
13 |
>>>>>> |
14 |
>>>>> |
15 |
>>>>> OP is looking for an fs to put on a memory stick that will work |
16 |
>>>>> everywhere: |
17 |
>>>>> |
18 |
>>>>> - vfat |
19 |
>>>>> - exfat |
20 |
>>>> He asked for something that would work "across Gentoo systems". |
21 |
>>>> |
22 |
>>>> |
23 |
>>> How does exfat not fulfil that? |
24 |
>>> |
25 |
>>> |
26 |
>> because exfat does not work across gentoo systems. ext2 does. |
27 |
> Exfat works when the drivers are installed. |
28 |
> Same goes for ext2. |
29 |
> |
30 |
> It is possible to not have support for ext2/3 or 4 and still have a fully functional system. (Btrfs or zfs for the full system for instance) |
31 |
> |
32 |
> When using UEFI boot, a vfat partition with support is required. |
33 |
> |
34 |
> -- |
35 |
> Joost |
36 |
|
37 |
ext2 is on every system, exfat not. ext2 is very stable, tested and well |
38 |
aged. exfat is some fuse something crap. New, hardly tested and unstable |
39 |
as it gets. |
40 |
|
41 |
And why use exfat if you use linux? It is just not needed at all. |