1 |
2011/7/11 Dale <rdalek1967@×××××.com>: |
2 |
> Dale wrote: |
3 |
>> |
4 |
>> Bill Kenworthy wrote: |
5 |
>>> |
6 |
>>> On Mon, 2011-07-11 at 00:03 -0500, Dale wrote: |
7 |
>>>> |
8 |
>>>> Mark Knecht wrote: |
9 |
>>>>> |
10 |
>>>>> DAle, |
11 |
>>> |
12 |
>>> Hi Dale, not quite the same but something else to check - after my |
13 |
>>> 6monthly update round, I had two systems where FF refused to run - just |
14 |
>>> flashed up died. Erase .mozilla allowed one restart where I got a |
15 |
>>> window, any attempt to configure it killed FF. |
16 |
>>> |
17 |
>>> This is on gnome, not KDE so while symptoms differ, it may still be the |
18 |
>>> same root cause - some of the underlying packages needed rebuilding - it |
19 |
>>> was (maybe) nss and dev-lang/spidermonkey. Sorry, had a lot going on so |
20 |
>>> cant be more specific - it was strace that tipped me off (how I cant |
21 |
>>> remember). |
22 |
>>> |
23 |
>>> BillK |
24 |
>>> |
25 |
>> |
26 |
>> I'm going to try a clean directory for it here in a minute. I'm going to |
27 |
>> back up my whole home directory for good measure. |
28 |
>> |
29 |
>> I'm not holding my breath but I'll cross my fingers just in case. |
30 |
>> |
31 |
>> Dale |
32 |
>> |
33 |
>> :-) :-) |
34 |
>> |
35 |
> |
36 |
> OK. This is better. It seems to work. Can someone explain how a bad config |
37 |
> file in Firefox can cause a kernel panic? I thought things like this was |
38 |
> not possible? This sounds so windowish. o_O |
39 |
|
40 |
We already explained you above in the other thread. That shouldn't be |
41 |
possible in a sane system. You haven't found the root of the problem, |
42 |
just the way to avoid it. The problem is in either the kernel (or one |
43 |
of its modules) or the hardware. Firefox (or any other userland |
44 |
program) has not the power to do this if the kernel doesn't allow it |
45 |
or a hardware failure doesn't screw up something. |
46 |
|
47 |
|
48 |
-- |
49 |
Jesús Guerrero Botella |