Gentoo Archives: gentoo-user

From: Michael Mol <mikemol@×××××.com>
To: gentoo-user@l.g.o
Subject: Re: [gentoo-user] new machine : CPU : 22 nm vs 32 nm
Date: Thu, 26 Jul 2012 01:36:32
Message-Id: CA+czFiCCqWqwO8TriSMttM5-iuoVJi-536g3KeMZOVEE=T9wMQ@mail.gmail.com
In Reply to: Re: [gentoo-user] new machine : CPU : 22 nm vs 32 nm by Dale
1 On Wed, Jul 25, 2012 at 8:21 PM, Dale <rdalek1967@×××××.com> wrote:
2 > The point made about producing less heat with the smaller nm sounds
3 > reasonable tho.
4
5 Less heat with the smaller nm, but only if all other things remain equal!
6
7 In reality, manufacturers use additional margin within their TDP to
8 improve the product otherwise. Perhaps they increase the clock speed
9 somewhat. Perhaps they increase the amount of on-die cache. Perhaps
10 they reduce the instruction pipeline.
11
12 AMD, for example, has tended to maintain keep something in the market
13 for a 125W, 95W and 65W TDPs for several years. Each year, the
14 functionality that used to be in a 125W TDP processor shows up in a
15 95W TDP processor, and the latest 125W TDP processor beats the pants
16 off of last years'.
17
18 --
19 :wq

Replies

Subject Author
Re: [gentoo-user] new machine : CPU : 22 nm vs 32 nm Dale <rdalek1967@×××××.com>