Gentoo Archives: gentoo-user

From: "Stefan G. Weichinger" <lists@×××××.at>
To: gentoo-user@l.g.o
Subject: Re: [gentoo-user] otrs
Date: Thu, 22 Sep 2011 11:50:25
Message-Id: 4E7B20BA.1030005@xunil.at
In Reply to: Re: [gentoo-user] otrs by Joost Roeleveld
1 Am 22.09.2011 13:29, schrieb Joost Roeleveld:
2 > Please don't CC me into all the emails, list-mails end up correctly.
3
4 sorry for the noise
5
6 >> otrs doesn't have that flag!
7 >
8 > Just noticed, the 3.x versions appear to have that flag removed. I
9 > wonder why they did that as it makes managing webapplications a lot
10 > simpler that way.
11
12 The ebuild seems a bit outdated and non-maintained.
13
14 > The 3.0.10 version wants me to unmask a few too many other packages
15 > for my liking to have a quick check.
16
17 Understood.
18
19 > Did you read the documentation and have a look at the sample
20 > configuration provided?
21
22 sure, I did
23
24 > From what I see in the patch for the
25 > httpd.include file, I don't think it belongs in the vhosts.d folder
26 > as this is supposed to be for definitions of vhosts-files.
27
28 Yep. I had it pasted into the existing default-host already, but the
29 problem was that the path of otrs was outside the setting of:
30
31 DocumentRoot "/var/www/localhost/htdocs"
32
33 I wanted to avoid moving the stuff there from /var/lib/otrs manually, to
34 keep portage happy in future.
35
36 Might try to cp the ebuild into a local overlay and edit $OTRS_HOME to
37 something like "/var/www/localhost/htdocs/otrs", just to get on with it.
38 I have people waiting to use OTRS ...
39
40 I really wonder that I am the first person hitting these issues.
41
42 btw, just found that bug and updated it ...
43
44 https://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=220553
45
46 Thanks, Stefan

Replies

Subject Author
Re: [gentoo-user] otrs Joost Roeleveld <joost@××××××××.org>