1 |
On Sat, 13 Aug 2016 16:08:34 +0200, hw wrote: |
2 |
|
3 |
> infrequently update Gentoo because I´m *always* running into problems |
4 |
> like this. |
5 |
|
6 |
Every time, or is that just hyperbole? |
7 |
|
8 |
> 'Infrequently' means about every 3 months at home, and not |
9 |
> since, IIRC, 2015-02 here at work. The last update at home got stalled |
10 |
> because perl cannot be updated, and I haven´t had the time to look into |
11 |
> that to finish it. |
12 |
|
13 |
Problems like this are usually resolved quickly. Syncing and updating a |
14 |
couple of days later would probably have sorted it. |
15 |
|
16 |
> The other reason is that it takes time to update the kernel when a new |
17 |
> one comes along, so updating like every week is not feasible. And I |
18 |
> don´t want to reboot all the time. |
19 |
|
20 |
You don't need to boot into every new kernel that hits portage. As long |
21 |
as your current kernel has no security issues you can stick with it. |
22 |
Plenty of people use Gentoo with only the LTS kernels. |
23 |
|
24 |
> Besides, I don´t want to update too frequently because there may issues |
25 |
> with new versions of software. |
26 |
|
27 |
If you use the stable arch, you don't get brand new versions. Packages |
28 |
are normally a month old before they hit stable. |
29 |
|
30 |
> If you say that you need to update more frequently than every 3 months |
31 |
> for not to have problems with the update process itself, I can only |
32 |
> conclude that Gentoo is entirely unsuited for servers --- and for home |
33 |
> use as well other than for test machines perhaps. |
34 |
|
35 |
It may be more a case of Gentoo being unsuited for you, your |
36 |
expectations and your preferred way of working. In fact, any rolling |
37 |
release distros sounds like it won't be right for you. |
38 |
|
39 |
|
40 |
-- |
41 |
Neil Bothwick |
42 |
|
43 |
Failure is not an option...it is integrated with every Microsoft product. |