Gentoo Archives: gentoo-user

From: Alan McKinnon <alan.mckinnon@×××××.com>
To: gentoo-user@l.g.o
Subject: Re: [gentoo-user] Re: Re: Is GWN dead?
Date: Tue, 15 Jan 2008 20:54:58
Message-Id: 200801152248.54895.alan.mckinnon@gmail.com
In Reply to: Re: [gentoo-user] Re: Re: Is GWN dead? by Eric Martin
1 On Tuesday 15 January 2008, Eric Martin wrote:
2 > > Anybody that feels they *need* or *must have* an official Gentoo
3 > > installer is probably the wrong target market and should be
4 > > referred to other distros that will suit their needs better. This
5 > > is not a troll or an elitist statement, it's just recognizing what
6 > > gentoo is and what it isn't - it's not a distro suitable for
7 > > someone to whom chroot isn't yet second nature.
8 > >  
9 >
10 > I don't think it's an elitist statement, I agree in thinking that we
11 > shouldn't cater to the lcd.  There are plenty of distros out there
12 > that work just fine and the greatest thing about FOSS is choice.  If
13 > all of the options are the same there's no point.  Again though, I
14 > have to disagree with the point that it's not for somebody whom
15 > chroot isn't yet second nature: I learned chroot through the install.
16 >  I've tried playing around with Fedora / Ubunttu but I keep going
17 > back to Gentoo; it's my favorite distro.
18
19 I know my statement about chroot looks like it should be taken
20 literally, but it wasn't meant that way. Read it more as illustrative,
21 that the potential user should be reasonably familiar with the more
22 unusual commands in *nix systems - chroot, grep, the idea of pipes and
23 redirection and many many more. After all if they are going to be using
24 these tools, they should know something about them.
25
26 --
27 Alan McKinnon
28 alan dot mckinnon at gmail dot com
29 --
30 gentoo-user@l.g.o mailing list

Replies

Subject Author
Re: [gentoo-user] Re: Re: Is GWN dead? Mark Knecht <markknecht@×××××.com>