1 |
Alan McKinnon wrote: |
2 |
> to build other distros. It is not suitable for newbies (disregard the |
3 |
> occasional newbie that does get it right, that's a minority and very |
4 |
> atypical), and one really does have to have moved beyond the "Oh, look! |
5 |
> Shiny installer!" mentality to appreciate it. When you get to that |
6 |
> stage, you appreciate that you need a bootstrap system to build the |
7 |
> first stages of your own distro, and you can get that bootstrap system |
8 |
> from any place you feel like getting it from. |
9 |
> |
10 |
I came to Gentoo at gentoo 1.2 / gentoo 1.4 (I don't remember the year |
11 |
but it was around 2002). I was a GNU/Linux newbie who only knew RedHat |
12 |
and didn't quite understand compiling kernels. Doing the install taught |
13 |
me GNU/Linux and I'm better for it. I think newbies should try it, but |
14 |
unfortunately a lot might be turned off because it's 'too much work'. |
15 |
> Anybody that feels they *need* or *must have* an official Gentoo |
16 |
> installer is probably the wrong target market and should be referred to |
17 |
> other distros that will suit their needs better. This is not a troll or |
18 |
> an elitist statement, it's just recognizing what gentoo is and what it |
19 |
> isn't - it's not a distro suitable for someone to whom chroot isn't yet |
20 |
> second nature. |
21 |
> |
22 |
I don't think it's an elitist statement, I agree in thinking that we |
23 |
shouldn't cater to the lcd. There are plenty of distros out there that |
24 |
work just fine and the greatest thing about FOSS is choice. If all of |
25 |
the options are the same there's no point. Again though, I have to |
26 |
disagree with the point that it's not for somebody whom chroot isn't yet |
27 |
second nature: I learned chroot through the install. I've tried playing |
28 |
around with Fedora / Ubunttu but I keep going back to Gentoo; it's my |
29 |
favorite distro. |
30 |
|
31 |
just my $0.02 |
32 |
eric |
33 |
-- |
34 |
gentoo-user@l.g.o mailing list |