| 1 |
Apparently, though unproven, at 01:21 on Saturday 20 November 2010, Neil |
| 2 |
Bothwick did opine thusly: |
| 3 |
|
| 4 |
> On Fri, 19 Nov 2010 22:13:50 +0000, Mick wrote: |
| 5 |
> > Short of measuring the latency with some system (which I wouldn't know |
| 6 |
> > how) I have experimented with setting the /boot partition on primary |
| 7 |
> > and logical partitions and the difference (on a stopwatch) was |
| 8 |
> > measurable in seconds betweeen having said partition on a primary and |
| 9 |
> > having it on a logical. |
| 10 |
> |
| 11 |
> Are you talking about GRUB loading time, kernel loading or what? |
| 12 |
> Since /boot isn't normally mounted or used once the kernel is loaded, I |
| 13 |
> don't see how relevant this is. |
| 14 |
|
| 15 |
And: |
| 16 |
|
| 17 |
Boot time differences measured in *seconds*? |
| 18 |
|
| 19 |
fifty bucks says his fsck number came up |
| 20 |
|
| 21 |
-- |
| 22 |
alan dot mckinnon at gmail dot com |
Archives