1 |
Apparently, though unproven, at 18:19 on Friday 22 October 2010, Stroller did |
2 |
opine thusly: |
3 |
|
4 |
> On 22 Oct 2010, at 12:29, Neil Bothwick wrote: |
5 |
> > ... Openrc will be stabilised at some time, |
6 |
> > so you may as well do the upgrade when you feel like it rather that when |
7 |
> > the devs decide to flip a keyword. |
8 |
> |
9 |
> I thought this was a matter of debate - Openrc was IIRC the creation of Roy |
10 |
> Marples, who was originally a Gentoo dev and the baselayout maintainer. |
11 |
> |
12 |
> As Roy developed baselayout 2 (or "baselayout - The Next Generation", as |
13 |
> you might call it) he decided to generalise it, AFAICT, in order to make |
14 |
> it useful to other distros or unices (e.g. the BSDs). |
15 |
> |
16 |
> Roy is no longer a Gentoo dev and is no longer maintaining Openrc: |
17 |
> http://roy.marples.name/projects/openrc |
18 |
> |
19 |
> I understood the future of Openrc within Gentoo to be in question: |
20 |
> http://archives.gentoo.org/gentoo-dev/msg_ce55de133ca592b638db758c9e457370. |
21 |
> xml or http://tinyurl.com/3xglcqb |
22 |
|
23 |
Did you and I read the same mail thread? I read all of it - did you? |
24 |
|
25 |
The end result of that is not that there is a question over openrc, it is that |
26 |
openrc will proceed. And anyone else that wants to pursue systemd or any other |
27 |
init system is free to go ahead and show up on gentoo-dev with running code. |
28 |
Meanwhile, openrc is where it's going. |
29 |
|
30 |
The thread started with someone wondering about openrc; I disagree with your |
31 |
conclusion about where it ended. |
32 |
> |
33 |
> Roy is the author, his own words: |
34 |
> The fact that several people said they would attempt a |
35 |
> stable push and then gave up (I was one - lol) says quite a |
36 |
> bit really. |
37 |
> |
38 |
> That Gentoo-dev thread was 3 or 4 months ago, and I haven't read all of it |
39 |
> today. But based on my understanding, I would discourage anyone in stable |
40 |
> from migrating to Openrc unless they need to, or unless they're deciding |
41 |
> to run entirely ~arch packages on their system. From my understanding I |
42 |
> would "wait and see", and migrate when the devs decide the time is right |
43 |
> for a mass migration of stable users. |
44 |
|
45 |
That's a straw man argument. Roy left Gentoo because of conflicts between his |
46 |
wish to be 100% POSIX compliant and most everyone else thinking they should |
47 |
just stick with bashisms and gentooisms. Which is kinda reasonable considering |
48 |
that portage REQUIRES bash. |
49 |
|
50 |
Roy did not leave openrc development becuase it's a lost cause. He left |
51 |
apparently because it stopped being fun - the usual (and often only valid) |
52 |
case for such things. |
53 |
|
54 |
|
55 |
-- |
56 |
alan dot mckinnon at gmail dot com |