| 1 |
Stroller wrote: |
| 2 |
> |
| 3 |
> On 4 Oct 2009, at 15:54, Justin wrote: |
| 4 |
>>> ... |
| 5 |
>>> Did you read the part of my message where I said that: |
| 6 |
>>> |
| 7 |
>>>>> I'm running x86 (NOT ~x86), and all versions of postgresql-server |
| 8 |
>>>>> are marked with a ~. |
| 9 |
>> |
| 10 |
>> You are right but the problem should be solved 'cause it isunmasked |
| 11 |
>> again. |
| 12 |
>> I couldn't imagine a dev masking something where there is no stable |
| 13 |
>> alternative. |
| 14 |
> |
| 15 |
> I've just synced and it still seems to be ~ only. |
| 16 |
> |
| 17 |
> Am I reading this wrong? |
| 18 |
> http://packages.gentoo.org/package/dev-db/postgresql-server |
| 19 |
> |
| 20 |
> I'm thinking to file a "no stable ebuild for PostgreSQL server", but I'm |
| 21 |
> just cautious in case I'm overlooking something stupid and obvious. |
| 22 |
> |
| 23 |
> Stroller. |
| 24 |
> |
| 25 |
> |
| 26 |
You missunderstood me. The keyword situation is the same, means -doc and |
| 27 |
-base are stable but -server not. But the masking of dev-db/postgresql |
| 28 |
is reverted. So you will not have any problems. |
Archives