1 |
Dale wrote: |
2 |
> William Kenworthy wrote: |
3 |
>> On 07/01/13 09:44, Mark Knecht wrote: |
4 |
>>> On Sun, Jan 6, 2013 at 5:22 PM, Dale <rdalek1967@×××××.com> wrote: |
5 |
>>> <SNIP> |
6 |
>>>> I'm not sure that is a bug. As I posted earlier, this was changed a |
7 |
>>>> good while back. There was a reason for it but I can't recall what it |
8 |
>>>> was. The new devices for CD/DVDs is /dev/sr*. I don't have, and have |
9 |
>>>> not had, /dev/cdrom or dvd on this rig for a good while and it works. I |
10 |
>>>> think this happened about the same time as the hard drive devices were |
11 |
>>>> changed from hd* to sd* even for old IDE drives. Since it was changed |
12 |
>>>> on purpose, I don't believe this is a bug. |
13 |
>>>> |
14 |
>>>> Dale |
15 |
>>> Might be true but how about digging up some references that this was |
16 |
>>> done on purpose. It makes little sense to me that if someone did this |
17 |
>>> on purpose, breaking lots of old scripts, leaving broken udev rules |
18 |
>>> laying about and just assuming everyone would figure it out without so |
19 |
>>> much and a news item then I'd say it was done pretty badly. |
20 |
>>> |
21 |
>>> Again, if it truly was 'on purpose' as you say then that's OK, but |
22 |
>>> let's not create too much false history here. In my mind it's just as |
23 |
>>> reasonable that it's just a mistake or someone that was overlooked, |
24 |
>>> but I'm totally open to you showing us what we all missed. |
25 |
>>> |
26 |
>> Seems like the cabal has been busy again ... its not a bug but a feature! |
27 |
>> |
28 |
>> http://git.kernel.org/?p=linux/hotplug/udev.git;a=commit;h=19b66dc57cce27175ff421c4c3a37e4a491b9c01 |
29 |
>> |
30 |
>> Also some hits on gentoo forums etc which imply that when actually |
31 |
>> merged, the rules file was not included.. |
32 |
>> |
33 |
>> This did happen awhile back and I just moved to /dev/sr0 and got on with |
34 |
>> life so didnt go into it in too much detail. |
35 |
>> |
36 |
>> BillK |
37 |
>> |
38 |
> This is not Gentoo specific but I found this in a search that is just |
39 |
> getting started: |
40 |
> |
41 |
> http://rlworkman.net/howtos/libata-switchover |
42 |
> |
43 |
> So, it did happen when switching from old IDE based drivers to the |
44 |
> newer, some claim improved, PATA/SATA drivers. It appears the kernel |
45 |
> started this but still searching for confirmation. |
46 |
> |
47 |
> Like Bill, when it was changed, I just updated the device information in |
48 |
> my programs and went on. It was the new way and it seemed it was going |
49 |
> to be around for a good long while. It looks like people who have |
50 |
> created scripts are going to have to fire up vi or nano and do a little |
51 |
> updating. |
52 |
> |
53 |
> Going to search some more to get a better source. |
54 |
> |
55 |
> Dale |
56 |
> |
57 |
> :-) :-) |
58 |
> |
59 |
|
60 |
|
61 |
This links goes to a specific post in the thread. Don't scroll or you |
62 |
will have to dig. The one to look far if it messes up is the post by |
63 |
NeddySeagoon. |
64 |
|
65 |
http://forums.gentoo.org/viewtopic-p-6362608.html#6362608 |
66 |
|
67 |
More info: |
68 |
|
69 |
http://www.gentoo.org/doc/en/kernel-config.xml#doc_chap3 |
70 |
|
71 |
According to one page I found, this happened several years ago so no |
72 |
idea how anyone missed it this long. It was discussed on this very list |
73 |
but my archives don't go back that far. I figure if I don't run into a |
74 |
problem in a year or so, I missed it which is a odd thing of itself |
75 |
since I usually find every problem there is. ;-) |
76 |
|
77 |
Dale |
78 |
|
79 |
:-) :-) |
80 |
|
81 |
-- |
82 |
I am only responsible for what I said ... Not for what you understood or how you interpreted my words! |