Re: [gentoo-user] Re: 4 machines - no /dev/cdrom or /dev/dvd anymore

[Dale]

William Kenworthy wrote:
> On 07/01/13 09:44, Mark Knecht wrote:
>> On Sun, Jan 6, 2013 at 5:22 PM, Dale <rdalek1967@×××××.com> wrote:
>> <SNIP>
>>> I'm not sure that is a bug.  As I posted earlier, this was changed a
>>> good while back.  There was a reason for it but I can't recall what it
>>> was.  The new devices for CD/DVDs is /dev/sr*.  I don't have, and have
>>> not had, /dev/cdrom or dvd on this rig for a good while and it works.  I
>>> think this happened about the same time as the hard drive devices were
>>> changed from hd* to sd* even for old IDE drives.  Since it was changed
>>> on purpose, I don't believe this is a bug.
>>>
>>> Dale
>>
>> Might be true but how about digging up some references that this was
>> done on purpose. It makes little sense to me that if someone did this
>> on purpose, breaking lots of old scripts, leaving broken udev rules
>> laying about and just assuming everyone would figure it out without so
>> much and a news item then I'd say it was done pretty badly.
>>
>> Again, if it truly was 'on purpose' as you say then that's OK, but
>> let's not create too much false history here. In my mind it's just as
>> reasonable that it's just a mistake or someone that was overlooked,
>> but I'm totally open to you showing us what we all missed.
>>
> Seems like the cabal has been busy again ... its not a bug but a feature!
>
> http://git.kernel.org/?p=linux/hotplug/udev.git;a=commit;h=19b66dc57cce27175ff421c4c3a37e4a491b9c01
>
> Also some hits on gentoo forums etc which imply that when actually
> merged, the rules file was not included..
>
> This did happen awhile back and I just moved to /dev/sr0 and got on with
> life so didnt go into it in too much detail.
>
> BillK
>

This is not Gentoo specific but I found this in a search that is just
getting started:

http://rlworkman.net/howtos/libata-switchover

So, it did happen when switching from old IDE based drivers to the
newer, some claim improved, PATA/SATA drivers.  It appears the kernel
started this but still searching for confirmation.

Like Bill, when it was changed, I just updated the device information in
my programs and went on.  It was the new way and it seemed it was going
to be around for a good long while.  It looks like people who have
created scripts are going to have to fire up vi or nano and do a little
updating. 

Going to search some more to get a better source. 

Dale

:-)  :-) 

-- 
I am only responsible for what I said ... Not for what you understood or how you interpreted my words!