| 1 |
On 04/04/2013 10:10, Nuno J. Silva (aka njsg) wrote: |
| 2 |
> Sort of the same here, except that I use lan0 instead of eth0, because |
| 3 |
> once in a while I use broadcom's wireless drivers instead of the kernel |
| 4 |
> drivers, and the former assign an ethX name. |
| 5 |
> |
| 6 |
> Sadly, I still get some problems after resuming from hibernation: |
| 7 |
> *sometimes*, the ethernet NIC won't be renamed lan0 (and remains eth0), |
| 8 |
> and I have to rmmod and modprobe. |
| 9 |
> |
| 10 |
> Also sadly, the fact that several people go "oh noes you can't use |
| 11 |
> wlan0" when I try to get comments on how to fix the issue does not |
| 12 |
> help a lot... |
| 13 |
|
| 14 |
|
| 15 |
I hear you :-) |
| 16 |
|
| 17 |
The amount of FUD and misinformation surrounding the entire udev |
| 18 |
"ecosystem" over the past 6 months defies all belief. I don't think I've |
| 19 |
ever seen quite this much hysteria and mob-think in anything |
| 20 |
computing-related until now. And that includes SCO, which is saying |
| 21 |
something... |
| 22 |
|
| 23 |
I gets so bad that people are starting to make shit up to be worried |
| 24 |
about, instead of just reading the simple document that is right in |
| 25 |
front of their eyes that already fully and completely answers the |
| 26 |
question at hand.... |
| 27 |
|
| 28 |
|
| 29 |
|
| 30 |
|
| 31 |
|
| 32 |
-- |
| 33 |
Alan McKinnon |
| 34 |
alan.mckinnon@×××××.com |
Archives