| 1 |
On 2013-04-04 5:13 AM, Alan McKinnon <alan.mckinnon@×××××.com> wrote: |
| 2 |
> I gets so bad that people are starting to make shit up to be worried |
| 3 |
> about, instead of just reading the simple document that is right in |
| 4 |
> front of their eyes that already fully and completely answers the |
| 5 |
> question at hand.... |
| 6 |
|
| 7 |
But Alan, haven't you read the recent (past couple of DAYS) emails in |
| 8 |
this very thread from people who followed the current 'simple document' |
| 9 |
you refer to and it did not work as advertised? I don't think these |
| 10 |
people are making this stuff up - are you saying you do? |
| 11 |
|
| 12 |
Not to mention the fact that this final/current seemingly complete |
| 13 |
document was way, way too late for the many people who ended up with |
| 14 |
totally broken systems, and *that* is what caused all of the 'hysteria |
| 15 |
and mob-think' you so condescendingly speak of. |
| 16 |
|
| 17 |
It is these reports that is causing me all kinds of fear/trepidation at |
| 18 |
this seemingly simple/benign update (as you seem to believe it is). |
| 19 |
|
| 20 |
So, again, I would really, really like a very simple answer as to the |
| 21 |
*best* way to retain the old way that is least likely to cause problems |
| 22 |
down the road (ie, if/when udev is subsumed by systemd). Currently I |
| 23 |
count 3 different ways. |
| 24 |
|
| 25 |
Or, as an alternative, *how* to switch to eudev (their web page does |
| 26 |
*not* have simple/precise instructions on how to switch, only a |
| 27 |
description of what it is) - ie, do I just emerge -C udev && emerge -C |
| 28 |
virtual/udev && emerge eudev? Or is there more to it? |
Archives