| 1 |
> > Does anyone else have a comment on this? Does turning on berkdb |
| 2 |
> > increase the performance of the applications that can utilize it, with |
| 3 |
> > the downside of another package on the system? How about gdbm? |
| 4 |
> |
| 5 |
> At one point berkdb and gdbm conflicted in cyrus-sasl and I think there |
| 6 |
> were issues in PHP as well... this is roughly 2-3 years ago. I started |
| 7 |
> turning berkdb off for most things and never noticed a difference. My |
| 8 |
> understanding is that they do the same thing. |
| 9 |
> |
| 10 |
> I'd say using neither is an issue. Apache will start, process config |
| 11 |
> files, and then use berkdb or gdbm to create a hash of the vhosts for |
| 12 |
> fast lookups. I'd assume Apache has some less efficient fallback code to |
| 13 |
> hash configs or it would fail to build without one or the other. |
| 14 |
|
| 15 |
It sounds like I should have one or the other on. I guess I'll go for |
| 16 |
berkdb since it's a default and gdbm is not. |
| 17 |
|
| 18 |
- Grant |
| 19 |
-- |
| 20 |
gentoo-user@g.o mailing list |
Archives