| 1 |
Grant wrote: |
| 2 |
> Does anyone else have a comment on this? Does turning on berkdb |
| 3 |
> increase the performance of the applications that can utilize it, with |
| 4 |
> the downside of another package on the system? How about gdbm? |
| 5 |
|
| 6 |
At one point berkdb and gdbm conflicted in cyrus-sasl and I think there |
| 7 |
were issues in PHP as well... this is roughly 2-3 years ago. I started |
| 8 |
turning berkdb off for most things and never noticed a difference. My |
| 9 |
understanding is that they do the same thing. |
| 10 |
|
| 11 |
I'd say using neither is an issue. Apache will start, process config |
| 12 |
files, and then use berkdb or gdbm to create a hash of the vhosts for |
| 13 |
fast lookups. I'd assume Apache has some less efficient fallback code to |
| 14 |
hash configs or it would fail to build without one or the other. |
| 15 |
|
| 16 |
kashani |
| 17 |
|
| 18 |
-- |
| 19 |
gentoo-user@g.o mailing list |
Archives