1 |
R0b0t1 wrote: |
2 |
> On Sat, Feb 17, 2018 at 9:11 PM, Dale <rdalek1967@×××××.com> wrote: |
3 |
>> R0b0t1 wrote: |
4 |
>>> Hello List, |
5 |
>>> |
6 |
>>> This isn't normal. Is it due to the new process model? I think I read |
7 |
>>> that now they emulate chrome, which possibly means both browsers are |
8 |
>>> unsuitable for use. Firefox will require its threads be OOM killed if |
9 |
>>> not closely monitored. |
10 |
>>> |
11 |
>>> If it can be fixed - can anyone explain? |
12 |
>>> |
13 |
>>> Cheers, |
14 |
>>> R0b0t1 |
15 |
>>> |
16 |
>>> |
17 |
>> |
18 |
>> Have you checked to see what in Firefox is using that memory? |
19 |
>> about:memory Then click on Verbose and then Measure. In the past, I |
20 |
>> have found websites that are just awful at loading everything Firefox |
21 |
>> has and usually for no good reason. It's one reason I use adblock, with |
22 |
>> some custom blocking not related to ads, and script blocking tools as |
23 |
>> well. I can give those memory hungry things a toss in the trash before |
24 |
>> they even load. |
25 |
>> |
26 |
>> Maybe that will help. Of course, it could be just Firefox being |
27 |
>> Firefox. I have seen mine use 2GBs in the past but never that much. :/ |
28 |
>> |
29 |
>> Hope that leads to a clue. |
30 |
>> |
31 |
> It's a good tip, but the report seems to be a bit optimistic. Firefox |
32 |
> claims there are 5 processes using ~500MB each, yet if I close Firefox |
33 |
> 10G is suddenly free. Regardless of whether or not Firefox thinks it |
34 |
> is using the memory, the kernel thinks it is, because OOM killer |
35 |
> triggers. |
36 |
> |
37 |
> It may or may not be related to certain webpages, I can't especially tell. |
38 |
> |
39 |
> Cheers, |
40 |
> R0b0t1 |
41 |
> |
42 |
> |
43 |
|
44 |
I'm stuck on Firefox 56 at the moment, addon issues. Anyway, I've had |
45 |
Firefox, and Seamonkey, to become quite the memory hog before too. |
46 |
Sometimes the memory things works but it's hard to grasp at times. |
47 |
Other times, it just provides no help at all. I was hopeful that it |
48 |
would point out a particular addon or website for you. |
49 |
|
50 |
I run multiple profiles here because I have to be logged into the same |
51 |
site but as different users. Sometimes the best thing to do is |
52 |
restart. I have found that some sites take up a chunk of memory but |
53 |
when I close all the tabs for that site, it doesn't seem to release that |
54 |
memory until I restart Firefox. I don't know if it is the website or |
55 |
Firefox because sometimes it seems to work as it should and sometimes |
56 |
not, even with the same site. |
57 |
|
58 |
It seems that any web browser that has a lot of bells and whistles is |
59 |
just going to be a memory hog. I have to admit tho, 10GBs is |
60 |
excessive. That would make me cringe a bit too. |
61 |
|
62 |
Maybe the next update will fix it??? |
63 |
|
64 |
Dale |
65 |
|
66 |
:-) :-) |