1 |
On Wed, Jul 3, 2013 at 2:29 AM, Stefan G. Weichinger <lists@×××××.at> wrote: |
2 |
> Am 03.07.2013 00:42, schrieb Paul Hartman: |
3 |
>> On Tue, Jul 2, 2013 at 2:56 PM, Stefan G. Weichinger <lists@×××××.at> wrote: |
4 |
>>> |
5 |
>>> Does anyone use that controller with gentoo? |
6 |
>>> |
7 |
>>> If yes, which driver/module does support it? |
8 |
>>> |
9 |
>>> I ordered one for a server and did not really check the facts ;-) |
10 |
>> |
11 |
>> Looks like it uses the LSI SAS2008 chipset (basically LSI controller |
12 |
>> with HP branding), so you should enable kernel module mpt2sas |
13 |
>> (CONFIG_SCSI_MPT2SAS) and probably some other SAS-related options will |
14 |
>> be required as well if you don't already use them. |
15 |
>> |
16 |
>> I actually just installed a card with this same chipset in my Gentoo |
17 |
>> machine yesterday! I have not attached disks to it yet, as I am |
18 |
>> waiting for the enclosure to be delivered, but so far nothing froze or |
19 |
>> burst into flames when the module loaded. :) I even upgraded the BIOS |
20 |
>> and firmware on the card from within linux and everything seems okay, |
21 |
>> so far. |
22 |
> |
23 |
> Thanks a lot, Paul, for that feedback. Seems that you will be the first |
24 |
> to really test it, my box will arrive next week, I assume. This will be |
25 |
> an installation from scratch so no SAS-related stuff there already. |
26 |
> |
27 |
> I wonder if it makes sense to attach the disks to that adapter as well? |
28 |
> This box will do amanda backups ... so there will be the amanda holding |
29 |
> disk and it is important to have maximum speed between that holding area |
30 |
> and the tape drive. I plan RAID1 on 2x2TB disks at least or maybe even |
31 |
> RAID0 (it's a rather temporary storage area so the redundancy isn't that |
32 |
> important). Testing will show! |
33 |
|
34 |
Mine will be attached to an external 8-disk storage array with 2 |
35 |
external SAS cables (4 disks per cable). I had a 5-disk 8TB software |
36 |
RAID5 in my computer that I had to remove due to an unplanned |
37 |
motherboard upgrade. Right now the disks are in a cheap external |
38 |
5-disk eSATA/USB JBOD enclosure plugged into the eSATA port on my |
39 |
motherboard, but it's not able to access all disks at the same time, |
40 |
so the RAID5 performance is awful. Around 10-20 MB/sec on writes and |
41 |
max 50MB/sec on reads. (It was previously 100MB+/sec for both |
42 |
operations.) |
43 |
|
44 |
In the eSATA enclosure, a single scrub (check) of my array takes FOUR |
45 |
DAYS to complete! I worry about what will happen if I have to replace |
46 |
a disk, the rebuild would take forever... what if there is a power |
47 |
outage and my UPS battery only lasts around 30 minutes? |
48 |
|
49 |
I bought two of the lowest-quality 4tb Seagate drives for US$140 each |
50 |
on sale and plan to use them to make a backup copy of my files from |
51 |
the RAID onto those drives. So far I have never made a backup of my |
52 |
RAID because I never had enough storage space to duplicate it all. |
53 |
"RAID is not a backup" has been repeating in my head for all these |
54 |
years. Horror stories about a corrupt filesystem, or 1 bad sector |
55 |
causing the whole RAID5 rebuild to fail. Now that I will have extra |
56 |
drive bays, maybe I can add a second parity drive and try to do an |
57 |
online upgrade from RAID5 to RAID6. I definitely want to make a good |
58 |
backup before I try that... |
59 |
|
60 |
I am hopeful that the SAS controller and enclosure should give me high |
61 |
performance again! I will let you know how it goes. |
62 |
|
63 |
BTW, I am using the latest 3.9 series linux kernel. |