1 |
On Sat, July 4, 2009 03:58, Volker Armin Hemmann wrote: |
2 |
> On Samstag 04 Juli 2009, Jesús Guerrero wrote: |
3 |
> |
4 |
> |
5 |
> I don't filter anything. Just default metalog with default settings. |
6 |
|
7 |
I use sysklogd, that shouldn't matter much though. The config is pretty |
8 |
standard, and certainly there's nothing related to fglrx in there. The |
9 |
logs on a normal day are, at most, a few kb's (without fglrx+.30). |
10 |
|
11 |
With that combo into scene, kern.log and syslog grow around 500mb each |
12 |
filling the whole var. I need to delete these two files and restart |
13 |
sysklogd to get some free space in /var (just in case someone around |
14 |
has a similar problem). A quick hack on the printk code in the kernel |
15 |
can be used though to solve all this spam. But the cpu usage doesn't |
16 |
get any better. |
17 |
|
18 |
I know not the reason why, but the truth is that xv wastes lots more |
19 |
of cpu to play video when I have fglrx+.30, with or without the logs, |
20 |
with or without patching the kernel. I really, really doubt that the |
21 |
configuration of my system has anything to do with this, unless it has |
22 |
to do something with some kernel setting. |
23 |
|
24 |
> I know how the logs are filled up with 3d apps - but it is not as bad on |
25 |
> THIS |
26 |
> system. So what might be the reason? |
27 |
|
28 |
No idea. But it's all fglrx spam, that's for sure. Why does it generate |
29 |
more in my system? Well, I blame the hardware, since it's a driver who |
30 |
creates all the spam, there are really few things that I could |
31 |
"missconfigure", besides my kernel, that would affect it. I don't use |
32 |
any essoteric stuff in xorg.conf, and I do not even use a compositing wm. |
33 |
|
34 |
> sorry about that last line. |
35 |
|
36 |
No harm done. Heat raises easily sometimes. I apologize for anything I've |
37 |
done wrong as well. |
38 |
|
39 |
Regards. |
40 |
-- |
41 |
Jesús Guerrero |